First of all, I think there are several special features we can call it "Art",including:Art is using to express our feelings,interactive activities and tell complex message in an easy way.
While I am reading Adams's article, I found out his definition on "Digital games - But are they art?" is a must-have content of Art. Besides, Art can teach people in a moral way, pass the cultural values to the next generation and express the author feelings. Art is a one-shot work, which cannot be done twice.
Adam thinks Digital Games can be art but digital games failed one condition - games can't just like art in the society development.Adam mentioned that Art can be a framework for criticism and establish the principles.*
In my opinion, digital games can be Art because the games designer design a lot of mission situation and colorful costume.Those things can be expressed as Art.We can find the fusion of popular culture and games mission.Video games is a special collaboration to express Art in a digital platform and Computer graphics.
photo: http://venturebeat.com/2013/04/17/u-s-digital-game-revenues-were-stable-in-march-superdata-says/
*Adams.E,Will Computer Games Ever Be A Legitimate Art Form?
It's a nice draft of your post but I think you should develop a further discussion on your arguments. I can see you added some picture of the game. You could e.g. Write what game it is and elaborate if it's art or not according to you including some of the points from Adams.
回覆刪除